directory
home contact

Why study an evil or failing character?

From Teaching Poetry in the High School. Arthur Fairchild.

On first thought, it strikes one as somewhat anomalous that the finest and deepest moral effects produced through the study of poetry should come through the study of evil and failing characters. But, anomalous or not, a moment's reflection convinces one that it is so. Not the perfect characters but the imperfect and evil characters make the deepest appeal; make, indeed, any kind of effective appeal to our imagination and to our moral sense.

Macbeth and Lady Macbeth, Brutus and Julius Caesar, Hamlet and Ophelia, Othello and lago, Satan in Paradise Lost, Lancelot and Guinevere, the Duke in My Last Duchess, Andrea del Sarto and Lucrezia: all are evil or failing characters, failing rather than inherently evil, no doubt, if we see deep enough, 1 but all alike lacking in precisely those moral qualities which a study of their characters consistently inspires. Why is this?

In the first place, the study of an evil or failing character, artistically presented, calls forth a series of standards in terms of which that character is said to be evil or to have failed. To judge an act as evil or deficient is necessarily to have a standard according to which the judgment is made. If we could not perceive what Macbeth ought to have done we could never know that he did wrong; if we could conceive no ideals of which Andrea and Lucrezia fell short, we could find nothing to condemn in their lives. But Shakespeare makes it clear, if it need be made so, that Macbeth should never have killed his king; and Browning lets us know that Andrea should never have sacrificed his art for an ignoble woman. Each character is so presented by the artist as to make it reasonably evident what the implied ideals are. These intimations of ideals the reader catches and groups together in imagination into a conception of an ideal character.



And there the pleasure lies. Not in what the poet gives us but in what he enables us to do for ourselves do we find delight. Just as the child prefers the rag doll to the doll fully equipped, so the reader prefers the evil or failing character to the perfect character. Each affords more room for the play of imagination. The child does not play with the rag doll; she plays with her imagination; the doll is simply a concrete starting point; the child's imagination joyously calls up images of what the doll is conceived to be baby, mother, grandparent; the bold outlines of the figure, the lack of detail, leave the imagination unchecked in its. play. So the reader of a poem or play does not want a perfect character. That would leave his imagination nothing to supply.

He wants the outline, chiefly a negative outline, that will enable him to build up a conception of a character for himself. "Always," if I may quote words that I have used elsewhere, "no matter how perfect in some respect the poetic representation of a thing or person may be, there must be some occasion, some room, for the play of the imagination; there must be some opportunity for the reader to construct for himself, to supplement, to add, to supply almost endlessly out of his own experience; always he must be left free to do more for himself than the poet does for him; and yet to do something which, without the poet's aid, he could by himself never effectively attain." 2

But the reader does more than this. He does something more than find "On the earth the broken arcs; in the heaven a perfect round." In the moment of his aesthetic pleasure he becomes in imagination the ideal which he has conceived. Let us see how this comes about.
All the standards which any one makes use of ... are but reflections of his own potential self; they are a part of himself. A standard of feeling, of thought, or of action which any one holds, is something to which he regards himself as at least potentially capable of rising; it is, in the truest sense, a reflection of himself. ... It is this ideal self that each reader or spectator becomes. So long as he remains in an aesthetic attitude, so long as the flash of pleasure and delight lasts, he actually becomes his ideal and potential self; he is that self which he ideally conceives. The ideal of himself, so vainly and ineffectually pursued in the world of dust and action, suddenly becomes, in imagination, both real and present. The experience may last but for a moment; in any case it must be very short; but for that sweet moment he has held himself at the high level where is

"... the most difficult of tasks to keep
Heights which the soul is competent to gain."
In consciousness, in mind and soul, not in reality, not in the world of action as yet, he is for the moment his ideal self. 3

The study of an evil or failing character, artistically portrayed, results, then, in the finest moral effects possible through any medium or form of activity. It enables one actually to attain in imagination ideals of character, blurred, dimmed, lost sight of, amid the struggles of daily life or the din of the market-place. This indeed is, in part, the very meaning of poetry to us. Adolescents especially are constantly making and unmaking their ideals of character. The ideals conceived are practically determined by the influences under which the child comes at this formative period. If these influences are inspiring the mind of the boy or girl is moved toward a fine and lofty idealism; if they are commonplace or base, the mind is dragged down. It might seem as if the type of character to be studied in poetry, in order to attain the better end, would be a character which embodied all the virtues of life. But it is not so. No type of character is more efficacious in producing desirable moral effects than the evil or failing character, presented under artistic conditions and in accordance with the laws of art.


Notes

1. 1 All the greatest poets, Shakespeare especially, make it evident that ignorance rather than inherent viciousness and degeneracy of man is the fruitful source of error and tragic waste in life. This conviction, consistently implied by the teacher, especially in teaching drama, will be found to have a very real, however subtle, effect upon pupils.

2. The Making of Poetry, p. 173.

3. The Making of Poetry, p. 168. On the full significance of this, both for the individual and for society, see Ibid., chapters VI and VII.

How to cite this article:
Fairchild, Arthur. The Teaching of Poetry in the High School . Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1914. Shakespeare Online. 23 Nov. 2013. < http://shakespeare-online.com/plays/macbeth/whystudyevil.html >.


______________

Even More

 A Comparison of Macbeth and Hamlet
 The Effect of Lady Macbeth's Death on Macbeth
 The Curse of Macbeth
 On the Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth

 Macbeth Q & A
 Essay Topics on Macbeth
 Aesthetic Examination Questions on Macbeth
 What is Tragic Irony?

 Stages of Plot Development in Macbeth
 Time Analysis of the Action in Macbeth
 Macbeth Study Quiz (with detailed answers)
 Quotations from Macbeth (Full)
 Top 10 Quotations from Macbeth

 Shakespeare's Workmanship: Crafting a Sympathetic Macbeth
 Origin of the Weird Sisters
 Temptation, Sin, Retribution: Lecture Notes on Macbeth
 Alchemy and Astrology in Shakespeare's Day

 Characteristics of Elizabethan Tragedy
 Why Shakespeare is so Important
 Shakespeare's Language
 Shakespeare's Influence on Other Writers

 Daily Life in Shakespeare's London
 Life in Stratford (structures and guilds)
 Life in Stratford (trades, laws, furniture, hygiene)
 Stratford School Days: What Did Shakespeare Read?

 Games in Shakespeare's England [A-L]
 Games in Shakespeare's England [M-Z]
 An Elizabethan Christmas
 Clothing in Elizabethan England

 Queen Elizabeth: Shakespeare's Patron
 King James I of England: Shakespeare's Patron
 The Earl of Southampton: Shakespeare's Patron
 Going to a Play in Elizabethan London

 Ben Jonson and the Decline of the Drama
 Publishing in Elizabethan England
 Shakespeare's Audience
 Religion in Shakespeare's England

 Entertainment in Elizabethan England
 London's First Public Playhouse
 Shakespeare Hits the Big Time

Aristotle's Rules of Tragedy

microsoft images"Aristotle says this concerning the hero, or protagonist, of tragic drama, and Shakespeare's practice at every point supports him:

(1) A Tragedy must not be the spectacle of a perfectly good man brought from prosperity to adversity. For this merely shocks us.
(2) Nor, of course, must it be that of a bad man passing from adversity to prosperity: for that is not tragedy at all, but the perversion of tragedy, and revolts the moral sense.
(3) Nor, again, should it exhibit the downfall of an utter villain: since pity is aroused by undeserved misfortunes, terror by misfortunes befalling a man like ourselves." Arthur Thomas Quiller-Couch. Read on...

____




More to Explore

 Macbeth: The Complete Play with Annotations
 The Metre of Macbeth: Blank Verse and Rhymed Lines
 Macbeth Character Introduction
 Metaphors in Macbeth (Biblical)
 Figures of Speech in Macbeth

 The Theme of Macbeth
 Supernatural Solicitings in Shakespeare
 Shakespeare on Omens
 The Three Apparitions in Macbeth

 Macbeth, Duncan and Shakespeare's Changes
 Contemporary References to King James I in Macbeth
 The Royal Patent that Changed Shakespeare's Life

 Soliloquy Analysis: If it were done when 'tis done (1.7.1-29)
 Soliloquy Analysis: Is this a dagger (2.1.33-61)
 Soliloquy Analysis: To be thus is nothing (3.1.47-71)
 Soliloquy Analysis: She should have died hereafter (5.5.17-28)

 Differences between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth
 Explanatory Notes for Lady Macbeth's Soliloquy (1.5)
 The Psychoanalysis of Lady Macbeth (Sleepwalking Scene)
 Is Lady Macbeth's Swoon Real?

 Explanatory Notes for the Witches' Chants (4.1)
 Macbeth Plot Summary (Acts 1 and 2)
 Macbeth Plot Summary (Acts 3, 4 and 5)
 How to Stage a Production of Macbeth (Scene Suggestions)